A year after the Post’s investigation into three luxurious Hong Kong estates, only a quarter of homeowners have stopped occupying public land, with about 10 percent demolishing unauthorized structures. While experts acknowledge possible delays due to appeals, approvals, or tenant relocations, they urge the government to enhance enforcement and penalties for illegal land use.
Challenges and Excuses
According to experts, homeowners may have legitimate reasons for the delays in addressing the unauthorized structures on their properties. Issues such as appeals processes, pending approval for renovation plans, or the need to relocate tenants could contribute to the slow progress in rectifying the situation. However, these explanations might not justify the extended timeframe for compliance, prompting calls for stricter enforcement measures.
Government Action and Amendments
In response to the findings of the Post’s investigation, the Lands Department issued statutory notices to 34 out of the 50 houses in the estates, directing them to cease occupation and remove structures encroaching on public land. Authorities have warned of potential prosecution or issued warning letters to homeowners who fail to comply with the directives. Additionally, a proposed amendment to the Buildings Ordinance aims to address unauthorized structures and further regulate land use in high-end residential areas.
Despite the significant value of the properties in question, ranging from HK$50 million to HK$119 million each, the issue of unauthorized additions remains a critical concern. Many of these structures are built on government-owned slopes, raising environmental and legal implications that require swift and decisive action.
As the consultation period for the proposed changes to the ordinance concluded recently, stakeholders await further developments in the government’s approach to curbing illegal land use in upscale residential developments. The spotlight on these three estates serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding regulations and preserving the integrity of public land in a city known for its high property values and limited space.
