Jimmy Lai Denies Promoting Hostility Against China in Posts Supporting Pompeo Speech – Trial Update
Jailed Apple Daily founder Jimmy Lai has denied allegations of promoting hostility towards China amid his ongoing national security trial in Hong Kong. Lai, 77, refuted claims that he advocated anti-China sentiments by posting about a speech delivered by former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in July 2020.
Lai’s testimony in court revealed that he had only highlighted specific portions of Pompeo’s speech on Twitter, omitting sections where the US official called for international bodies to use economic and military power against Beijing. The media tycoon clarified that he focused on condemning tyranny rather than endorsing hostility.
Defense counsel Steven Kwan questioned Lai about his social media manager, Simon Lee, posting excerpts of the speech on Twitter. Lai maintained that his actions were not intended to incite animosity towards China. He emphasized that his posts were aimed at highlighting injustices rather than promoting aggression.
Behind the Tweets
Email records presented during the trial showed that Lai had received a transcript of Pompeo’s speech from a former US State Department advisor. However, Lai claimed he only read the transcript after reading news reports about the speech. Lai’s defense centered on the notion that his online presence was not meant to encourage hostile activities against China.
Managing Social Media
The court also delved into Lai’s social media manager’s autonomy in posting content on the tycoon’s Twitter account. Lai admitted that Lee had the freedom to share Lai’s text messages without explicit approval. The judge noted instances where Lee posted Lai’s messages as tweets without direct consent, prompting questions about the management of Lai’s social media presence.
Personal Stance
During the trial, Lai expressed his views on potential military conflicts between the US and China, lauding certain actions while acknowledging his lack of caution in messaging. He highlighted the need for Western governments to provide asylum to Hongkongers and emphasized the importance of freedom under the rule of law.
In a poignant moment, Lai articulated his desire for Hong Kong’s freedom from encroaching dictatorship, underscoring his commitment to upholding democratic values. Despite facing severe legal challenges, Lai’s unwavering dedication to advocating for justice and freedom remains a central theme in his trial.
As the trial unfolds, Lai’s testimony sheds light on the complexities of navigating political tensions and promoting democratic ideals in a challenging socio-political landscape. His steadfast stance against oppression and his pursuit of justice serve as a testament to the resilience of individuals fighting for fundamental rights in the face of adversity.
