Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai recently testified at his national security trial, stating that encouraging other countries to support the city’s pro-democracy movement should not be seen as seeking foreign interference. Lai, who is facing charges related to collusion with foreign forces and publishing seditious materials, could potentially face life in prison if convicted.
During the trial, Lai’s lawyer questioned him about the launch of an English version of his newspaper, Apple Daily, in mid-2020. Lai explained that having an English version would help garner support from Americans and other foreigners, which could serve as political protection for the movement in Hong Kong. He believed that having international voices speak up for the city would raise awareness among politicians about the situation in Hong Kong.
Lai emphasized that his intention was not to seek foreign interference but rather to draw attention to the challenges faced by the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong. He explained that with the anti-China sentiment prevalent during the Covid-19 pandemic, launching an English version of Apple Daily presented an opportunity to capture international support and amplify the voices of Hong Kongers.
The trial, which has spanned 95 days and was originally scheduled for 90 days, has seen Lai being questioned about his op-eds published in Apple Daily. Despite accusations of inciting violence, Lai maintained that his writings were advocating peaceful resistance against the encroachment of China on Hong Kong’s freedom. He clarified that his references to resistance were not about promoting violence but rather standing up for democratic values.
As the trial continues, Lai’s defence questioning is expected to last 15 days, with further discussions around Apple Daily’s English version and Lai’s Twitter account. The proceedings shed light on the challenges faced by media outlets and activists in Hong Kong under the national security law imposed by Beijing in response to the pro-democracy protests in the city.
Lai’s trial, conducted without a jury and presided over by judges appointed by Hong Kong’s chief executive, reflects the broader crackdown on dissent and civil society in the city. The national security legislation introduced in June 2020 has led to numerous arrests and the erosion of civil liberties, drawing criticism from international partners and human rights organizations.
The case of Jimmy Lai underscores the ongoing struggle for democracy and freedom of expression in Hong Kong, as activists and journalists navigate increasingly restrictive legal environments and face the threat of severe penalties for speaking out against government policies.
