China’s Influence on Pacific Islanders Forum Decisions
When the 18-member Pacific Islands Forum concluded its meeting on August 30, there was controversy surrounding the mention of Taiwan in the official communique. Initially, the communique included a reference to delegates reaffirming relations with China/Taiwan. However, this mention was quickly removed from the document after pressure from Chinese officials. The United States government confirmed this act, stating that it was part of efforts to limit Taiwan’s international presence and participation. This move highlights the significant influence that China wields over international organizations and the diplomatic landscape in the Pacific region.
Taiwan’s Response and Condemnation of Chinese Interference
Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs swiftly condemned the removal of Taiwan from the official communique as a “rude and unreasonable intervention” by China. They also criticized China for its ongoing efforts to undermine peace and stability in the region. This incident is just the latest in a series of actions by China to marginalize Taiwan on the global stage. Since 1993, when China first participated in the Pacific Islands Forum as a “development partner” under the name “Taiwan/ROC,” tensions over Taiwan’s participation in international forums have persisted.
During the recent PIF proceedings, the Solomon Islands proposed halting Taiwan’s participation in future gatherings, a motion that was ultimately blocked by other delegates. Taiwan’s MOFA undersecretary, Tian Zhongguang, expressed gratitude to the country’s three Pacific allies, Australia and New Zealand, for their support. Despite the challenges and conflicting positions on Taiwan’s participation, Tian signed a cooperation agreement with the PIF secretariat, committing to support and strengthen cooperation with friendly Pacific countries through the forum’s multilateral mechanisms.
China’s Efforts to Exclude Taiwan and Response to the Situation
China’s Ambassador to the Pacific, Qian Bo, played a key role in pressuring for Taiwan’s exclusion from PIF functions and documents. He referred to the initial mention of Taiwan as a “mistake” and emphasized that any attempts by Taiwan to assert its presence in international forums would be futile. The Chinese foreign ministry echoed these sentiments, stating that Taiwan’s efforts to engage with the forum were self-deceptive.
Following the PIF, New Zealand engaged in a dialogue with the United States and Taiwan on security issues in the Pacific, underscoring the strategic partnerships between the three countries. They emphasized the importance of maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait and the broader Pacific region. Taiwan’s MOFA expressed gratitude to both governments and reiterated its commitment to promoting values diplomacy and safeguarding democracy, peace, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region.
Despite the challenges posed by China’s influence and efforts to exclude Taiwan, Taiwan’s MOFA remains hopeful about its continued positive role in the Pacific region. The ministry is committed to working with partners to uphold shared values and strengthen cooperation in the face of external pressures.
In conclusion, the recent incident involving Taiwan’s exclusion from the PIF communique sheds light on the complex dynamics at play in the Pacific region. China’s influence and efforts to marginalize Taiwan have significant implications for regional diplomacy and stability. It is essential for countries in the region to uphold principles of inclusivity and cooperation to ensure a peaceful and prosperous future for all nations involved.
